-
Section 51.942 Performance Evaluation of Tenured Faculty,
Texas Statutes Education Code: Title 3. Higher Education
Legal requirement for Post Tenure Review
- Post-Tenure
Review, Comments by Association of American Universities
"To better understand the extent and nature of PTR policies at AAU universities, the AAU Tenure
Committee contracted AAU Universities requesting information about any such policies they might
have, and inviting comments from member presidents and chancellors on PTR. The responses to this
request indicated that member institutions differ widely with respect to PTR policies."
- Post Tenure
Review: An AAUP Response, American Association of University
Professors
"On the other hand, if designed and implemented by the faculty in a form that properly
safeguards academic freedom and tenure and the principle of peer review, and if funded at a
meaningful level, it may offer a way of evaluating tenured faculty which supports
professional development as well as
professional responsibility."
- The Corrosion of
Tenure: A Bibliography, Philo Hutcheson
"This article provides a bibliography on actual institutional and faculty decisions on tenure
since the mid-1970s."
- Post-Tenure Review: Evaluating
Teaching, Joseph C. Morreale
"Maintaining excellence in an academic institution requires continuous development of its most
critical resource: its permanent tenured faculty. This necessitates a constructive developmental
program of post-tenure review. A central focus of this development is enhancing the relationship
between faculty and students in teaching and learning and between the faculty member, his or her
department, and the institution. Only in the continuous fostering of growth and development in
the area of the scholarship of teaching will an institution sustain its vitality, maintain the
interest of its diverse students, and assure the survival of both in an ever-changing world."
- Report to
the House of Representatives 78th Texas Legislature: Interim Report 2002,
House Committee on Higher Education, Irma Rangel, Chairwoman
"The basic impetus for SB 149 was a desire by state policymakers to have greater accountability
in
higher education, specifically with regard to tenured faculty at public institutions. Nearly all
institutions had some process of review for tenured faculty already inplace well before SB
149."
- Accountability in
Higher Education: A Public Agenda for Trust and Cultural Change, David E.
Leveille
"The system of tenure that dominates American higher education has long been a source of
controversy. Tenure has been attacked for entrenching a lazy professoriate and, on the other
hand, has been defended as crucial for the defense of open intellectual inquiry. The controversy
has sharpened in recent years, largely due to the abolishment of mandatory retirement in 1994,
which has heightened concerns about the productivity of older professors who received tenure long
ago, and also as a result of widespread concern over the steadily increasing cost of higher
education."
- Tenure Issues in
Higher Education, Michael McPherson and Morton Owen Schapiro
"Successful resolution of the tenure debate depends upon a more nuanced understanding of
what tenure is, and under what circumstances its use is most appropriate."
- Academic Freedom and Tenure, Virginia State University
|