HISTORY 2305: MILITARY HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

                                  (DR. NORMAN DELANEY)

 

                   CASE STUDY: THE ALAMO (March 1836)

 

I.                  Lecture/Discussion: Background of the Texas Revolution

Why had the political situation deteriorated into a war?

Was it a necessary war? (as viewed by both sides)

Were the goals on each  side clearly defined?

Who were the major figures involved on both sides?

What military advantages/disadvantages were there on both sides?

Who were the Tejanos? What were their motives?

 

II.               Influence of Napoleonic Wars on Strategy & Tactics (Clausewitz, Jomini)

 

III.           Weaponry:

Infantry (both sides)

Artillery (both sides)

Cavalry (Mexican lancers)

 

               References:

               Maps of Mexico/Texas in 1836; “The Alamo; Remembering

               Through Education; Mapping Texas History”;

               Brands, H. W. Lone Star Nation; The Epic Story of the Battle

               for Texas Independence;

              Castenada, Carlos E., ed. The Mexican Side of the Texan

              Revolution;

              Hardin, Stephen L. Texian Iliad; A Military History of the

              Texas Revolution, 1835-36;

              Matovina, Timothy. The Alamo Remembered: Tejano Accounts

              and Perspectives;

              Pena, Jose Enrique de la. With Santa Anna in Texas: A personal

              Narrative of the Revolution;

              Seguin, Juan N. A Revolution Remembered: The Memoirs and

              Selected Correspondence of Juan N. Seguin.

             Winders, Richard Bruce.  Sacrificed at the Alamo; Tragedy and

             Triumph in the Texas Revolution.

 

              Internet websites:

              www.thealamo.org

              http://home.austin.rr.com/rgriffin/texhisdocs.html   (See Texas

              Revolution)

              http://hotx.com/alamo.html     

              http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0318974/quotes 

 

IV.            The Alamo: Leadership, Strategy, and Tactics

          A. The two armies compared

          B.  The Alamo complex  (as it was in 1836); was it

               defensible? 

C.   Teaching Methodology: role playing (students  should be prepared to explain themselves in character)

D.   The Leaders:

        General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna

        General Sam Houston

        Lt. Colonel William Travis

        Colonel James Bowie

        Colonel James Fannin

                 Crossfire: Interrogation by the respective “troops”—be

                 tough on them!

                 What was your prior military experience?

                 What is your military training?

                 What are your personal stakes in this conflict?

                 Why should we follow you?

 

V.               Councils of War held on March 5, 1846

               A. Santa Anna with his officers

     officers’ advice as to course of action

     Santa Anna’s decision, disregarding all other options

  B. Travis addresses his men

     Travis’s decision to stay and fight; why stay and fight if

      defeat and death are inevitable?

      Other alternatives? escape? surrender?

 

VI.   Conclusion. Class critique:

Were there better choices? Discuss alternatives.

Was the outcome of this battle inevitable? If so, at what point?

What factors other than military (political) contributed to the Texans’ defeat?

On what basis did Santa Anna defend his policy of “no quarter”?

Was Santa Anna guilty of “war crimes”?

Was this engagement a significant  event?

What contributed to the Texan defeat at Goliad?

Did the Alamo defeat contribute to the Texans’ victory at San Jacinto?

Why is the story of the Alamo so popular even outside the United States?

Why has the Alamo become a part of folklore and mythology? Is this a bad thing?

What military lessons can we learn from the Alamo? Why should we study it?